Automotive

Comparing 21 supplier quotes in 14 minutes.

ProEquip's procurement lead used Sourceby's normalized comparison to award faster — without spreadsheets.

Feb 9, 2026 5 min read Mumbai, IN
FS
Farhan Shaikh
Procurement Lead u00b7 ProEquip Systems
Share this blog: All stories
Section 01

The challenge: comparison by spreadsheet archaeology

ProEquip Systems builds tooling and fixtures for automotive lines. A typical event drew 15–25 quotes — each a PDF or spreadsheet with different assumptions baked in. Building the comparison grid took days, and by the time it existed, half the quotes had been revised by email.

Section 02

What changed: normalized responses, weighted scoring

On Sourceby, quotes arrive against the event's standardized fields, so the comparison grid builds itself. ProEquip added weighted scoring — technical fit, commercial, lead time — so the award conversation happens against the same numbers for every supplier.

  • Quotes land comparable without re-keying
  • Weighted scoring makes trade-offs explicit
  • Revisions version against the same structure, so the grid stays current
Section 03

Results: a 14-minute award review

On a recent fixture package, the team compared 21 quotes and completed the award review in a 14-minute meeting. The grid was already built; the discussion was about trade-offs, not about whether the numbers were trustworthy. Zero spreadsheets were harmed.

Section 04

What to copy

Set your scoring weights before quotes arrive — it keeps the criteria honest. And let the grid drive the meeting: the fastest award cycles we see are teams arguing about a shared, current comparison instead of reconciling three private versions of one.

Topics
#comparison #weighted-scoring #award #tooling

Ready to build your own sourcing story?

See how Sourceby fits your sourcing workflow — book a 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your team.